Re: [ng-spice] Licensing issues
Kev wrote:
>
> Arno wrote:
> >
> > May I suggest a third alternative?
> >
> > We could contact the copyright holders, in this case the Berkeley CAD
> > Development Group, and ask them to rerelease the code under the GPL
> > license.
>
> I suggested this before.
>
> Does anyone want to take responsibility for the task?
>
> (I'll do it if no-one else knows anyone at Berkley, or
> wants to to do it.)
>
> I would like to see the solver code LGPL'd and a generic
> device model interface, with the standard models LGPL'd.
It's definitely worth trying. Should we write a common request to Berkeley?
Who makes the draft?
manu
Partial thread listing: