Re: [ng-spice] Readline Response
> Michele Quarantelli wrote:
>
> >
> > ABOUT ACS:
> >
> > Going back to ACS I think the idea is pretty neat, however, it is far from
> > being an usable simulator. I've tested it and is has poor convergence
> > properties compared to Berkeley Spice and I think the C++ implementation
> > could be improved (conversion rather that inheritance should be used).
> > However, since I'm not a skilled C++ programmer, may be I'm missing
>something
> > important which invalidates my position.
>
>
> My feeling is that c++ should be avoided - if we intend to rewrite spice
>entirely
> (under a GPL license this time) then we can use ACS version 0.13 which is
>still in C.
>
>
> manu
>
Actually, if carefully coded C++ could give us more flexibility in the future
expansions of the simulator.
I'm currently checking acs-0.24 ... I'll post a feedback.
Michele
Partial thread listing:
- Re: [ng-spice] Readline Response, (continued)