Re: [ng-spice] Readline Response


To ng-spice@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it
From Michele Quarantelli <quarante@legs.ing.unibs.it>
Date Wed, 25 Aug 1999 18:42:31 +0200
Delivered-To mailing list ng-spice@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it
In-Reply-To Your message of "Fri, 20 Aug 1999 13:38:42 +0200." <37BD3E42.BEB0521E@wanadoo.fr >
Mailing-List contact ng-spice-help@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it; run by ezmlm
Reply-To ng-spice@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it

> Michele Quarantelli wrote:
> 
> > 
> > ABOUT ACS:
> > 
> > Going back to ACS I think the idea is pretty neat, however, it is far from
> > being an usable simulator. I've tested it and is has poor convergence
> > properties compared to Berkeley Spice and I think the C++ implementation
> > could be improved (conversion rather that inheritance should be used).
> > However, since I'm not a skilled C++ programmer, may be I'm missing 
>something
> > important which invalidates my position.
> 
> 
> My feeling is that c++ should be avoided - if we intend to rewrite spice 
>entirely
> (under a GPL license this time) then we can use ACS version 0.13 which is 
>still in C.
> 
> 
> manu
> 
Actually, if carefully coded C++ could give us more flexibility in the future
expansions of the simulator.

I'm currently checking acs-0.24 ... I'll post a feedback.

  Michele




Partial thread listing: