Re: [ng-spice] Readline Response


To ng-spice@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it
From Michele Quarantelli <quarante@legs.ing.unibs.it>
Date Mon, 30 Aug 1999 16:07:36 +0200
Delivered-To mailing list ng-spice@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it
In-Reply-To Your message of "Mon, 30 Aug 1999 14:02:48 +0200." <Pine.LNX.3.96.990830135422.7585A-100000@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it >
Mailing-List contact ng-spice-help@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it; run by ezmlm
Reply-To ng-spice@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it

> 
> 
> On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Michele Quarantelli wrote:
> 
> > I've tried ng-spice version 0.3 with the LNA: now OP analysis succedeed to
> > converge to the right (at least expected) solution even by using the 
>BSIM3v3.2
> > code (just a warning on the wrong version ...) .
> Ok, may be Manu fixed some problems with pointers data types. Spice is a
> mes, it has a good modularity but is very poorly coded. 
> 
> > Regarding the test becnh there is an old benchmark suite at 
> > http://www.cbl.ncsu.edu/Benchmark_dirs/CircuitSim90.
> I have it , but I prefer to not include it in the ng-spice sources, it's
> rather large. As soon as I have some spare time I will make a samll web
> site for the project  with lots of links, on the other hand, if anyone
> want to build this site, I will be very grateful to such a pious soul.
> 
>  
> > > This includes BJT, MOS2, MOS3, test set, some of them very large.
> I have tried some of them and they failed as in the documentation ;-)
> 
> PAolo 


Latest test is good even with the predictor option enabled.

Michele



Partial thread listing: