Re: [ng-spice] Readline Response
Michele Quarantelli wrote:
> >
> > My feeling is that c++ should be avoided - if we intend to rewrite spice
>entirely
> > (under a GPL license this time) then we can use ACS version 0.13 which is
>still in C.
> >
> >
> > manu
> >
> Actually, if carefully coded C++ could give us more flexibility in the
>future
> expansions of the simulator.
That's not really the point - C++ is far less commonly known than C in
the enginering world, significantly reducing the possible pool of
contributors and testers/patchers.
It's certainly not a coincidence that the majority of open source
projects are coded in C rather than C++.
manu
Partial thread listing:
- Re: [ng-spice] Readline Response, (continued)