Re: [ng-spice] Readline Response
Michele Quarantelli wrote:
>
> ABOUT ACS:
>
> Going back to ACS I think the idea is pretty neat, however, it is far from
> being an usable simulator. I've tested it and is has poor convergence
> properties compared to Berkeley Spice and I think the C++ implementation
> could be improved (conversion rather that inheritance should be used).
> However, since I'm not a skilled C++ programmer, may be I'm missing
>something
> important which invalidates my position.
My feeling is that c++ should be avoided - if we intend to rewrite spice
entirely
(under a GPL license this time) then we can use ACS version 0.13 which is
still in C.
manu
Partial thread listing:
- Re: [ng-spice] Readline Response, (continued)