Re: [ng-spice-devel] Proposal for a letter to Richard Newton


To ng-spice-devel@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it
From Erik de Castro Lopo <erikd@zip.com.au>
Date Tue, 23 May 2000 19:15:26 +0000
Delivered-To mailing list ng-spice-devel@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it
Mailing-List contact ng-spice-devel-help@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it; run by ezmlm
Organization Erik Conspiracy Secret Labs
References <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000523091829.13023E-100000@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it >
Reply-To ng-spice-devel@ieee.ing.uniroma1.it
Sender erikd@zip.com.au

Hi all,

My only suggestion is a reordering of the questions. I think Q3 
should be first, and then Q2, Q1 and then Q4.

Ciao,
Erik

PS : One type marked below.

Paolo Nenzi wrote:
> 
> What do you think ?
> 
> Dear Prof. Newton,
> 
> We have read your mail about working together on spice3 sources and we
> would  ask you some details.
> 
> 1) As you may have seen on our web site, we are aiming at the
>    development of a GPL covered circuit simulator based on spice3.
>    This means that, if UCB does not want to worn on spice3 anymore,
                                              ^^^^^
Typo --------------------------------------->  work

>    there will be a split in the development tree.
>    How would UCB react to a (very) possible split  in the development
>    tree ?
> 
> 2) This question is a consequence of the first. Does UCB wish to
>    proceed the developing of spice, after porting the sources to
>    an open model ?
> 
> 3) We would like a clarification on 'make the code compliant with Open
>    Source'.  What exactly is required?  Adding a copyright header to
>    each file is easy to do.  What source modification is are you
>    referring to ?
> 
> 4) What about using the current ng-spice development tree ?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> .....

-- 
+-------------------------------------------------+
     Erik de Castro Lopo     erikd@zip.com.au
+-------------------------------------------------+
Will the last person leaving Redmond please turn off all the lights.

Partial thread listing: